Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dmitry's avatar

Interestingly enough, Gladiator was able to appeal to midwit (and below) American understanding of what democracy is by its inclusion of a pro-Senatorial angle — even though of course, Roman Senate and US Senate only share a name and US Senate is only an egalitarian mockery of highly elitist Roman Senate.

Mark's avatar
16mEdited

Gladiator (2000) did not feature Africans or East Asians or Indians or Mexicans/Aztecs as Roman emperors, and when it did feature say blacks, it was in historically accurate roles that made sense.

And even the 2000s were not that much more homogenous than today (you would have a point if you were talking about pre 90s). Even the original Pirates of the Caribbean trilogy which is pretty diverse doesn’t have minorities as British officers lol.

Is the historical accuracy or ethnic composition of Gladiator or other 2000s movies too much to ask for? Because if it is, we might as well just return to Marvel capeshit.

3 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?