Capital equals cheap labor which equals diversity. This idea that economic populism somehow contributes to the browning of America is a total misnomer. It's libertarian cringe trying to hide behind a defense of white identity, an identity that capital has, at best shown complete indifference towards. Really don't understand where Greer is coming from with this, as he's insisted on taking this line multiple times.
He's deporting nons who get free housing, health care while they grill and grape, lining the pockets of the rich race traitors who let poor whites pay for it, not to mention the social cost in terms of destroyed neighborhoods, crime. This is economic populism. Not to mention it's tightening the labor market and hiring for white men is up. So I don't think the two are mutually exclusive. Given how many tariffs the rest of the world places on our goods, often quite high, America fighting fire with fire also seems like a good idea. If the world shouldn't dump their people here, they shouldn't dump their goods either. White people could use some economic populism. Laissez Faire has certainly been used as a bludgeon against them.
White people who are race traitors, sure. White people who actually have a sense of collective interests, I would think, ought to feel quite differently. A European people who remain totally bifurcated (as Charles Murray discussed in 'Coming Apart') are unlikely to be very high in trust or willing to make sacrifices for one another. A society full of rich people with mostly made up jobs and what David Graeber referred to as 'bullshit jobs' in the service industry that don't pay the bills will not accomplish much or produce much and be extremely vulnerable to conquest, no matter how rich they are, with even copious wealth, it would seem, becoming more and more illusory and reliant on interdependence with other countries which do not have their best interests at heart.
Which brings me to my next point, China. An alienated poor white underbelly is something the Chinese would be idiots not to exploit in further economic attacks, sewing the seeds of division among whites even if the non problem is completely solved, thereby repeating what one might call the Hart/Cellar cycle all over again. Tariffs work, across epochs, countries, varied economic conditions. See here:
Glad to see Governor Desantis making another appearance on highly respected!
Part of the Eastwing is an underground bunker built in the 40s. Will that still be there?
Capital equals cheap labor which equals diversity. This idea that economic populism somehow contributes to the browning of America is a total misnomer. It's libertarian cringe trying to hide behind a defense of white identity, an identity that capital has, at best shown complete indifference towards. Really don't understand where Greer is coming from with this, as he's insisted on taking this line multiple times.
“Meeting a lovely debutante” is cracking me up
Scott, would you ever do a IQ supplement on the China Question?
He's deporting nons who get free housing, health care while they grill and grape, lining the pockets of the rich race traitors who let poor whites pay for it, not to mention the social cost in terms of destroyed neighborhoods, crime. This is economic populism. Not to mention it's tightening the labor market and hiring for white men is up. So I don't think the two are mutually exclusive. Given how many tariffs the rest of the world places on our goods, often quite high, America fighting fire with fire also seems like a good idea. If the world shouldn't dump their people here, they shouldn't dump their goods either. White people could use some economic populism. Laissez Faire has certainly been used as a bludgeon against them.
White people who are race traitors, sure. White people who actually have a sense of collective interests, I would think, ought to feel quite differently. A European people who remain totally bifurcated (as Charles Murray discussed in 'Coming Apart') are unlikely to be very high in trust or willing to make sacrifices for one another. A society full of rich people with mostly made up jobs and what David Graeber referred to as 'bullshit jobs' in the service industry that don't pay the bills will not accomplish much or produce much and be extremely vulnerable to conquest, no matter how rich they are, with even copious wealth, it would seem, becoming more and more illusory and reliant on interdependence with other countries which do not have their best interests at heart.
Which brings me to my next point, China. An alienated poor white underbelly is something the Chinese would be idiots not to exploit in further economic attacks, sewing the seeds of division among whites even if the non problem is completely solved, thereby repeating what one might call the Hart/Cellar cycle all over again. Tariffs work, across epochs, countries, varied economic conditions. See here:
https://www.unz.com/article/richard-hananias-economic-illiteracy/