Discussion about this post

User's avatar
BankerAtLarge's avatar

What strikes me as an Indian reader is the selective nature of moral deference in modern Western politics.

Almost no one else gets this treatment. Most communities are expected to obey the law, assimilate, compete, study, work, and avoid disorder. Indians, East Asians, Jews, and many immigrant groups are judged by fairly unforgiving standards. If they fail, no one builds an elaborate mythology to explain away the failure.

But with blacks and Muslims, the West seems to suspend ordinary judgment. Crime, disorder, underachievement, separatism, or even sympathy for political violence are often explained through grievance, trauma, marginalization, colonialism, racism, Islamophobia, or “root causes.” The standard applied to everyone else is quietly relaxed.

This is why cases like Duke Lacrosse, O.J. Simpson, Ferguson, Trayvon Martin, Iryna Zarutska and now Karmelo Anthony are so clarifying. The facts matter less than the moral script. One group is presumed endangered, another presumptively guilty, and the public is asked to pretend this is justice.

The same pattern appears with Islam. After 9/11, an earlier generation might have responded with ugly street revenge. Instead, liberal Western society overcorrected in the opposite direction. The new posture became: we are so morally advanced, so unlike our bigoted ancestors, that we will show special indulgence even toward communities where sympathy for extremism, separatism, or anti-Western politics is far too common. The election of Zohran Mamdani feels like part of that same moral theatre: proof that the white voter is enlightened precisely because he refuses to notice what would be obvious in any other context.

To outsiders, especially non-white outsiders, this is baffling. We do not view this with historical guilt. We see a simpler picture: some groups are held to universal standards, while others are granted exemptions from them.

That double standard cannot last forever. A society can be generous, forgiving, and pluralistic. But it cannot survive if law-abiding, high-performing communities are treated as morally suspect while disorderly or separatist communities are endlessly indulged.

The real shift may be that more people, including immigrants, are finally willing to say this plainly.

Mark's avatar

Blacks as a collective supporting the party of mass immigration was suicidally stupid. About as if not more suicidal than liberal Jews doing it.

The new immigrants are indifferent to the black story in America. At best, they like the famous black celebrities everyone likes + sports. But they aren’t gonna care about MLK or Civil Rights as much as old school American Whites.

66 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?