Blah blah blah on Soldo's part. I've been hearing this from Euros my whole life. First, it was the Left that wanted to remove the Fascist Americans, now it's the right that wants to remove the GAE. Meanwhile they are spiritually Chinese as they pretend they're this great immortal political bloc but nearly everything they have is thanks to America.
And it's Esperanto, not Latin, that was supposed to be the new Lingua Franca. Much easier than Latin. Or even English.
I second their concern. America should get out of Europe and stop wasting our time and treasure on the backwards dump. Maybe the individual nations will actually be nations again instead of subservient vassals to the eu or nato or whatever is in brussels. America can focus on our homeland instead of trying to keep useless vassals in line.
The Whiter a region the more libtarded it seems to be. The Nordic countries and New England go hand in hand on this. Britain had an immigration invasion in the 70s (The Ugandan Asians) and this probably helped stop the UK from becoming more socialist and get Thatcher elected. Nordic countries being super White went incredibly left wing and without race being a factor they became hyper feminist. Iceland is the most feminist country in the world and it is the Whitest country in the world.
America had a race problem since the founding with slavery. The race problem never stopped and other race problems have also emerged outside of blacks. Despite being far more diverse America has elected a real right wing leader in a 53% White country. Many in Europe compare themselves to America and think themselves better "we wouldn't treat blacks like that" and do the opposite of America to show how much better they are.
Amazon used diversity to stop unionization and kill leftism sentiment (no solidarity between the races) and countries can do this as well.
You are 100% right about New England states being very liberal like Vermont and Maine. But your theory fails when you look at the Northern Rockies states of Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming. Idaho especially is very conservative.
The EU is the problem, not the US. Dissolve the bureaucratic monstrosity, restore full national sovereignty, and create intra-European alliances which serve the respective states' interests, and Europe can be great again.
No it does not. We don't even have mandated gender quotas in the U.S. and go against our own laws. European leaders pass these laws on their own accord.
It does not, but it did. Of course, not directly and by force, but until this year USAID funded a myriad of liberal NGOs that spread a pro-immigration agenda. I do not think this is the main driver of the European situation – the major one is the lobbying and attitudes of European business circles – but America is not entirely blameless.
They view us influence as why their governments are libtarded (immigration, social issues) and they dont like US foreign policy. Some believe us economic and national security guarantees turns them weaker
Without America, Europe would become communist overnight. They are already halfway there.
Blah blah blah on Soldo's part. I've been hearing this from Euros my whole life. First, it was the Left that wanted to remove the Fascist Americans, now it's the right that wants to remove the GAE. Meanwhile they are spiritually Chinese as they pretend they're this great immortal political bloc but nearly everything they have is thanks to America.
And it's Esperanto, not Latin, that was supposed to be the new Lingua Franca. Much easier than Latin. Or even English.
Soldo’s a BAPNigger.
I second their concern. America should get out of Europe and stop wasting our time and treasure on the backwards dump. Maybe the individual nations will actually be nations again instead of subservient vassals to the eu or nato or whatever is in brussels. America can focus on our homeland instead of trying to keep useless vassals in line.
The Whiter a region the more libtarded it seems to be. The Nordic countries and New England go hand in hand on this. Britain had an immigration invasion in the 70s (The Ugandan Asians) and this probably helped stop the UK from becoming more socialist and get Thatcher elected. Nordic countries being super White went incredibly left wing and without race being a factor they became hyper feminist. Iceland is the most feminist country in the world and it is the Whitest country in the world.
America had a race problem since the founding with slavery. The race problem never stopped and other race problems have also emerged outside of blacks. Despite being far more diverse America has elected a real right wing leader in a 53% White country. Many in Europe compare themselves to America and think themselves better "we wouldn't treat blacks like that" and do the opposite of America to show how much better they are.
Amazon used diversity to stop unionization and kill leftism sentiment (no solidarity between the races) and countries can do this as well.
You are 100% right about New England states being very liberal like Vermont and Maine. But your theory fails when you look at the Northern Rockies states of Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming. Idaho especially is very conservative.
The EU is the problem, not the US. Dissolve the bureaucratic monstrosity, restore full national sovereignty, and create intra-European alliances which serve the respective states' interests, and Europe can be great again.
"America doesn’t set Europe’s immigration levels or gender quotas."
yes it does
No it does not. We don't even have mandated gender quotas in the U.S. and go against our own laws. European leaders pass these laws on their own accord.
It does not, but it did. Of course, not directly and by force, but until this year USAID funded a myriad of liberal NGOs that spread a pro-immigration agenda. I do not think this is the main driver of the European situation – the major one is the lobbying and attitudes of European business circles – but America is not entirely blameless.
Yes it does, because Israel controls the US and the US controls Europe. Stop being a BAPNigger.
I don't follow EU politics much... What exactly are the elements of American influence that they deem to be negative?
They view us influence as why their governments are libtarded (immigration, social issues) and they dont like US foreign policy. Some believe us economic and national security guarantees turns them weaker