Singapore is a good example. A lot of right wingers worship Singapore but it is essentially a one-party authoritarian state. To keep race relations calm they have ethnic quotas in apartment buildings, colleges, government positions, and hate speech laws. A lot of people point to Singapore as a multicultural success, but it really is only manageable due to its strict authoritarianism. The only positive thing about Singaporean style leadership is the hate speech laws would apply equally to all people and all forms of hate even against the majority would be taken seriously. However, I still don't think that's a great system.
Singapore also has segregated facilities and work arrangements. For example, Muslims and Buddhists won't eat with each other so they are given different break times so they can be apart.
In a multiracial society everyone walks on eggshells and must watch their tongue. Or rather, white people must walk on eggshells while everyone else can pretty much say what they want about white people as long as they don't criticize Jews and Israel. For years libertarians, liberals and even some cuckservatives told us that mass immigration leads to greater wealth and freedom but anyone with a brain knows that's a lie.
In America it's organized Jewish groups like the ADL who pose the greatest threat to the 1st amendment with their pressuring of large companies like Amazon and platforms to censor or ban so called anti-semitism and pro-white and anti-immigrant, anti-multiracialist points of view.
Shockingly it's Trump and the GOP who are making the first attempts to ban political viewpoints by banning so called anti-semitic viewpoints on college campuses.
Mentioning Canada, their demographics are changing at a far faster rate than in the US or Europe yet they will rally behind the flag because Orange Man bad. Don’t have any respect for a country where you can get your bank account shut down for protesting their regime.
The main freedom we have in the US Sunbelt is the freedom to be jugged at random, robbed, and be the victim of a knockout game. So basically the worst type of freedom.
When you use the "right wingers" phrase as you do, I bridle. ("Autists" seems correct.) Could we call them "monists" or something? "Centralists"? "Rationalists." "Monistic, Rationalist, Centralists?" "Unicratic?" Monocratists? When I think right-wing, I swell with pride. As Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn said, "Right is right, and Left is wrong." We need to protect the description from monism and every bad association, I think.
Singapore is a good example. A lot of right wingers worship Singapore but it is essentially a one-party authoritarian state. To keep race relations calm they have ethnic quotas in apartment buildings, colleges, government positions, and hate speech laws. A lot of people point to Singapore as a multicultural success, but it really is only manageable due to its strict authoritarianism. The only positive thing about Singaporean style leadership is the hate speech laws would apply equally to all people and all forms of hate even against the majority would be taken seriously. However, I still don't think that's a great system.
Singapore also has segregated facilities and work arrangements. For example, Muslims and Buddhists won't eat with each other so they are given different break times so they can be apart.
In a multiracial society everyone walks on eggshells and must watch their tongue. Or rather, white people must walk on eggshells while everyone else can pretty much say what they want about white people as long as they don't criticize Jews and Israel. For years libertarians, liberals and even some cuckservatives told us that mass immigration leads to greater wealth and freedom but anyone with a brain knows that's a lie.
In America it's organized Jewish groups like the ADL who pose the greatest threat to the 1st amendment with their pressuring of large companies like Amazon and platforms to censor or ban so called anti-semitism and pro-white and anti-immigrant, anti-multiracialist points of view.
Shockingly it's Trump and the GOP who are making the first attempts to ban political viewpoints by banning so called anti-semitic viewpoints on college campuses.
Mentioning Canada, their demographics are changing at a far faster rate than in the US or Europe yet they will rally behind the flag because Orange Man bad. Don’t have any respect for a country where you can get your bank account shut down for protesting their regime.
The main freedom we have in the US Sunbelt is the freedom to be jugged at random, robbed, and be the victim of a knockout game. So basically the worst type of freedom.
When you use the "right wingers" phrase as you do, I bridle. ("Autists" seems correct.) Could we call them "monists" or something? "Centralists"? "Rationalists." "Monistic, Rationalist, Centralists?" "Unicratic?" Monocratists? When I think right-wing, I swell with pride. As Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn said, "Right is right, and Left is wrong." We need to protect the description from monism and every bad association, I think.