I was recently driving North through Pennsylvania, through increasingly rural area as i left Philadelphia in the distance, and i wondered how far away i’d have to get from the city to find a gas station store with a White guy running it instead of an Indian. Well, i found one eventually, but only after driving for over three hours. Until then, even very small town gas stations were all staffed by Indians.
What’s my point with the above anecdote? Well, it lead me to the following question: why can’t conservative politicians oppose Indian immigration on the grounds that they form nepotistic ethnic mafias where they buy things out, fire the (American!) staff, and only hire their cousins to replace them? There’s plenty of evidence of this behavior (see: the patel hotel scandal that recently made the news) and there’s nothing inherently racialist about it, so it should be palatable to sensitive normie ears. Simply blame it on their culture or something.
I can hear it now - “we must impose a quota on Indian immigration because their ‘culture of nepotism’ is anti-American - in ‘Murica we believe in meritocracy!”.
One of the greatest double standards I see in modern life is this idea Whites only hire their own or are nepotistic and thats racist, meanwhile I see this behavior in spades from other groups, especially Indians and it’s never ever called out . Does the woke left including the media have a problem with hiring your own, or only when White people do it? I’d love to see them squirm to answer why is it okay to see Indians only hire other Indians, but criminal when Whites do the same? Just boggles the mind how all leftists don’t see or just embrace the double standards.
Does 100 Percent Indian staff at something count as diversity? Because if diversity is a strength, that’s not diversity and the lefts whole mantra falls apart.
I share your assessment. Pajeets took over NOVA before I left, very distasteful. I think if we got Canada levels of Indian immigration people would turn on them.
I will say one thing. Trump got the H1B issue basically right.
1) He didn't increase the cap, which is fairly low by most of the worlds standards.
2) He ended the H1B lottery in favor of giving them out based on who pays the highest salary. Indians hardest hit.
3) His "Golden Visa" gives rich foreigners a way to buy citizenship by giving money to citizens, rather then paying universities for fake degrees or setting up fake businesses.
4) Both Vivek and Elon are out in very public ways, discrediting the H1B crowd.
Trump says how much he loves Indians, but in terms of actual policy he's given anti-H1B people pretty much everything they want short of completely dismantling the program.
Every subdivision in suburban Texas is anywhere from 30-80% South Asian. The ironic thing is that South Asians are culturally conservative and even politically conservative on some major policies, but they still vote for the Democratic party in large numbers. The new President/Chairman of the Texas GOP (Texas Republican Party) is Indian/South Asian, so I believe they will be making a direct play for those voters as a political strategy in the future.
If the conflict does erupt, something in our favor is that the white population in 1900 was 36% of the worlds population. Today that figure is 16% and aging rapidly. As a child I had some dreams about "the struggle" (as per liberal indoctrination). I am kind of disappointed its ending with creedos on Substack and Twitter, I hoped for a more explosive showdown but I detest violence and would not want to be involved. Just the romantic in me.
Well, the Indo-Pak community also believes it’s permissible to engage in frottage on the DC Metro. So, no thanks for that little bit of the third world on our soil.
“This doesn’t mean regular Republicans love Indians. The popularity of Indian hate on social media indicates a lot of Americans are annoyed with them.”
No this is complete nonsense cos Twitter can be very unrepresentative of real life. Tiny political constituencies can seem much bigger than they are by tweeting relentlessly. The anti-Indian hate online isn't remotely reflective of a real world phenomenon. It's entirely caused by it becoming a fad among a few thousand twitter obsessives.
Hmm, I am an asian (Indian) elite in an ethnic enclave in America. I imagine if things really come to a head (race war) the states and districts of America would split on ethnic lines rather than a quick policy reversal.
Now I am an elite so I would always find some wealthy bubble to escape conflict, but good to measure the temperature of rural whites. Is all out race war or policy reversals against legal immigration/paths to citizenship more likely? I suppose that depends on the stability of the economy.
I was recently driving North through Pennsylvania, through increasingly rural area as i left Philadelphia in the distance, and i wondered how far away i’d have to get from the city to find a gas station store with a White guy running it instead of an Indian. Well, i found one eventually, but only after driving for over three hours. Until then, even very small town gas stations were all staffed by Indians.
What’s my point with the above anecdote? Well, it lead me to the following question: why can’t conservative politicians oppose Indian immigration on the grounds that they form nepotistic ethnic mafias where they buy things out, fire the (American!) staff, and only hire their cousins to replace them? There’s plenty of evidence of this behavior (see: the patel hotel scandal that recently made the news) and there’s nothing inherently racialist about it, so it should be palatable to sensitive normie ears. Simply blame it on their culture or something.
I can hear it now - “we must impose a quota on Indian immigration because their ‘culture of nepotism’ is anti-American - in ‘Murica we believe in meritocracy!”.
One of the greatest double standards I see in modern life is this idea Whites only hire their own or are nepotistic and thats racist, meanwhile I see this behavior in spades from other groups, especially Indians and it’s never ever called out . Does the woke left including the media have a problem with hiring your own, or only when White people do it? I’d love to see them squirm to answer why is it okay to see Indians only hire other Indians, but criminal when Whites do the same? Just boggles the mind how all leftists don’t see or just embrace the double standards.
Does 100 Percent Indian staff at something count as diversity? Because if diversity is a strength, that’s not diversity and the lefts whole mantra falls apart.
I share your assessment. Pajeets took over NOVA before I left, very distasteful. I think if we got Canada levels of Indian immigration people would turn on them.
I will say one thing. Trump got the H1B issue basically right.
1) He didn't increase the cap, which is fairly low by most of the worlds standards.
2) He ended the H1B lottery in favor of giving them out based on who pays the highest salary. Indians hardest hit.
https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/us-politics/h1b-visa-program-white-house-trump-b2807012.html
3) His "Golden Visa" gives rich foreigners a way to buy citizenship by giving money to citizens, rather then paying universities for fake degrees or setting up fake businesses.
4) Both Vivek and Elon are out in very public ways, discrediting the H1B crowd.
Trump says how much he loves Indians, but in terms of actual policy he's given anti-H1B people pretty much everything they want short of completely dismantling the program.
Americans haven’t yet understood that they are importing an overclass, and a highly biased one at that.
And if Indians copy the Jewish model, Americans won’t understand it again.
Who wouldn’t want these geniuses, look at the job they have done with India.
Every subdivision in suburban Texas is anywhere from 30-80% South Asian. The ironic thing is that South Asians are culturally conservative and even politically conservative on some major policies, but they still vote for the Democratic party in large numbers. The new President/Chairman of the Texas GOP (Texas Republican Party) is Indian/South Asian, so I believe they will be making a direct play for those voters as a political strategy in the future.
I would rather live under Total Wignat Supremacy, including unlimited rap music, marijuana, and obesity, than suffer one single "based" Indian.
If the conflict does erupt, something in our favor is that the white population in 1900 was 36% of the worlds population. Today that figure is 16% and aging rapidly. As a child I had some dreams about "the struggle" (as per liberal indoctrination). I am kind of disappointed its ending with creedos on Substack and Twitter, I hoped for a more explosive showdown but I detest violence and would not want to be involved. Just the romantic in me.
Well, the Indo-Pak community also believes it’s permissible to engage in frottage on the DC Metro. So, no thanks for that little bit of the third world on our soil.
“This doesn’t mean regular Republicans love Indians. The popularity of Indian hate on social media indicates a lot of Americans are annoyed with them.”
No this is complete nonsense cos Twitter can be very unrepresentative of real life. Tiny political constituencies can seem much bigger than they are by tweeting relentlessly. The anti-Indian hate online isn't remotely reflective of a real world phenomenon. It's entirely caused by it becoming a fad among a few thousand twitter obsessives.
Hmm, I am an asian (Indian) elite in an ethnic enclave in America. I imagine if things really come to a head (race war) the states and districts of America would split on ethnic lines rather than a quick policy reversal.
Now I am an elite so I would always find some wealthy bubble to escape conflict, but good to measure the temperature of rural whites. Is all out race war or policy reversals against legal immigration/paths to citizenship more likely? I suppose that depends on the stability of the economy.