Europe suffers from the thing that all whites suffer from: unwillingness to criticize nons. They do the same for "climate action" - they harangue first worlders instead of the real source of pollution.
European leftists criticize Americans because they imagine Americans as white (still). When we have a string of administrations with last names ending in vowels or first names with apostrophes, they will stop the criticism.
As for European rightists, they resent the fact that America has the politicians they don't.
I do follow a diverse set of people and publications, because I want to be informed; It is necessary to follow your adversaries and advocates to better understand events. Unfortunately, you are proving yourself to be an adversary—not just to me, but to our people as well. Perhaps, cynically, you are aware of the direness we face, so you’ve decided to get what you can get. And maybe that’s why you have chosen to be an establishment propagandist—whose role it is to gaslight Whites repeatedly.
Prediction: as soon as you weasel your way into a higher paying patronage network, you will paywall your comments section.
Who is your people? You're anti-American and think Hispanics are your people so long as they do socialism for BASED reasons. Whiteness is an artificial identity for you. Otherwise, you would recognize the absurdity of declaring your "people" to be anti-American non-whites who happen to like Hitler.
I used to paywall my comments section. I opened it to allow for more discussion. Sadly, it's led to morons like you appearing with your drivel. But I still will keep it open
What is America, Scott? What is an American, Scott? Define what you mean. Be clear so that your entire audience understands. Can hardly wait. Afraid to say, but you’re going to use up a lot of those precious IQ points you cherish.
Traditional American identity has always been linked with whiteness. Non-whites who hate America, celebrate every brown communist state, and pretend to be Nazis are not really American.
America herself is turning away from this economic model. Most Europeans criticize America for departing from this economic model. I find it interesting that European leaders will decry American influence, but then when Trump tries to withdraw influence and support from Europe, they have a panic attack. The main thing preventing America from bringing her troops home is the Europeans demanding they stay (with the collaboration of the American left).
There are two forces erupting at once. Nationalism makes for more friction between nations and it isn't surprising for nationalists of different countries to butt heads once in awhile. There's also a pan-Western battle between globalists and nationalists. The globalists are flooding the West with migrants, making terrible trade deals, starting wars and so on. Germany and the UK have govts that are the Biden admin on steroids, already where the U.S. Democrats might get to in 2032 or 2036 should they keep drifting in the same direction. The best criticism I've seen of Trump is the rhetoric allows the Starmers of Europe to act like nationalists. Canada is going way off the deep-end for similar reasons, such that Alberta really has an incentive to get out now before Carney and the Liberals take them past the point of no return.
The way most of Europe is strangling any kind of free speech (especially the Germans and the UK but the list is long), we must be their enemies. Germany has historically prevented the lower classes from speaking their minds (well, they have recently made exceptions for migrants but no one else) but the UK under the heel of Tories and Laborites is almost as anti-free speech as Germany. The elites in Europe today really do want to live like European nobles in the 1800s did.
It's one thing to oppose Europe's attacks on free speech and the EU actively advocating for WWIII against Russia and wholly another to endorse Trump's attack on Denmark/Greenland. Are you even capable of understanding such distinctions or are you a grug brained room temperature IQ subhuman?
And before you tar me as a shitlib I am literally a National Socialist, i.e.WAY right of you.
The orange man blew the dog whistle, the dog cringed then gave up the part of his bone that the orange man wanted. Mission accomplished from the orange point of view. But that's totally irrelevant to my original reply. We can't be friends with nations that prevent 95% (guess) of their people from saying anything the rulers don't like. If nothing else, they think of most US people as being lower-class scum just like their lower-class. No possible basis for friendship with someone who despises you. Kinda like jews wanting to be friends with nazis, not a hope in the world for the jew to haye a friendship relationship with a nazi.
FYI: No one skilled in negotiations starts negotiating by asking for what they want. They start by asking for way more so they give the other person can claim to have "won". Just like the European leaders are doing now.
Where did multiculturalism come from in the first place? Yes, Europe produced Rousseau and Marx (who wasn't a European, however) but neither of their ideologies compare to destruction wrought on by Hobbes and Locke in the long run. Say what you will about Soviets, after the short Trotskyist experiment at the beginning, they stopped imposing liberalism and turned into a relatively normal empire with a corrupt oligarchy and stupid ideology as religion that no one actually believed. America doesn't stop there.
So Europe should hand over Greenland, bend over to the US, and say "Thank you sir, may I have another?" And what does it say about American influence that the countries that were under the Iron Curtain are far more based today than those that were in NATO for the Cold War?
This rift between America and Europe is just like when George W Bush and Donald Rumsfeld were criticizing Europe and introducing "freedom fries" -- nothing's really changed. Fundamentally, America is a jingoistic, militaristic power that Europe doesn't understand or feel comfortable with. America always has the itch to invade countries or dabble in regime change, it's like excessive testosterone. (It's also religious and Puritan, which Europe has a problem with, but that's another matter.) Many on the far-right claim to dislike American neocons but Trump is very much a neocon, just a new iteration of it. The author of this blog disagreed that the Trump administration is neocon-ish, but what about this? "The U.S. Is Actively Seeking Regime Change in Cuba by the End of the Year" - Wall Street Joirnal: https://www.wsj.com/world/americas/the-u-s-is-actively-seeking-regime-change-in-cuba-by-the-end-of-the-year-1d0f178a
America has tried to do regime change in Cuba for nearly 70 years. We successfully did regime change several times in our past. I don't think the Spanish-American War was neocon. A peaceful regime change in Cuba would be in our interest. Having a role in the world and defending the national interest doesn't mean neocon. Too many think that in order to NOT be a neocon, we can't interact with the world at all or ever use our military.
"Ynaks"? Too busy trying to drum up controversy for book sales to actually edit? You consistently confuse Europeans, European politicians and unelected bureaucrats as one blob that represents the whole of Europe. Your only evidence that Europe status quo would continue is an event from the 18th century. Finally, you completely absolve America of funding leftist groups for decades. All things considered, it would seem the only reason you flipped on the matter is because you found a matter that would draw attention to yourself and your book.
I offer a ton of examples showing why the status quo would likely stay. You need to read beyond the French Revolution reference. I also don't absolve America of funding left-wing groups. It's pretty consistent to stand up for your country when attacked as the Great Satan and certain pretend their people have no agency.
In terms of representation, these are your leaders. I could've also pointed out how millions of Germans flooded the streets over AfD leaders merely meeting with Martin Sellner. That was not engineered by the CIA.
As I say in the piece, there are legitimate criticisms to make of America. But pretending we're the real enemy and everything would be BASED and Redpilled without us is delusional
A lot of problems on both sides of the Atlantic are attributed to the Allied victory in WWII. It’s unfalsifiable and rings true given our current circumstances.
Yet the real redpill imo is that the “pozz” was coming regardless of the victor in that contest. Libtardery was going to be ascendant, even under (and perhaps worse) the swastika. Modernity was getting its pound of flesh no matter the regime.
A fun way to troll the lost cause/“if only” crowd (yes, even Southerners) is to go even further back and attribute our current situation to some other conflict. My favorite is Sulla’s civil war. “If only the Populares had won! We wouldn’t have troons!”
Also, whatever Yockey’s problems were, I think we have to admit that a reasonably neutral and honest biopic of his life would be wildly entertaining. Starring Ryan Gosling of course.
Bullocks, How would America react if Russia claimed Alaska? What Trump is doing is illegal under the U.N. charter which as a treaty signed by the Federal government is binding law on the U.S. according to the Constitution.
I am no fan of globalism, but actual America first is not imperialist land grabs, it is living peacefully with other nations and trading with them as envisioned by the foundling fathers as for example in Washington's farewell address.Trump's aggressive imperialist ambitions more closely resemble the internationalism of Trotskyite communism than actual America First policies. This ought not be surprising as the (((neo-cons))) who hijacked Trump's foreign policy started out as Trotskyite Jews at New School in New York City.
It's possible to oppose globalism, and to want to withdraw from it peacefully, legally and gradually to not cause WWIII, grug brain.
And your history is not accurate, we had 40 years of not being an empire up to the time of Andrew Jackson's attacks on Indians, and the Monroe Doctrine both of which were betrayals of the peaceful isolationist intent of the founding fathers as expressed by Washington and Jefferson.
Sorry when was that forty year period of peaceful isolationism? Was it when we purchased Louisiana from France in 1803 and settled it en masse, violently displacing the natives for decades before AJ took the presidency? Or was it when we attacked Great Britain in 1812 to claim Canada?
"How would America react if Russia claimed Alaska?"
We would probably move a couple carrier strike groups to the North Pacific and tell them to come and take it. We have about ten more of those than Russia, which is why they won't claim Alaska.
You are legit reared aren't you? You literally couldn't grasp I was making an analogy. How do you manage to function like get up every day and make breakfast, tie your shoes, and drive to work?
Yes, and I was picking apart your analogy by illustrating that such scenarios are determined more by military might than by countries' dedication to "international norms" or whatever.
LOL, "people," like you betray everything Geroge Washington fought for. Your punishment for being an obnoxious imbecile is to read Washington's farewell address that was about avoiding "entangling alliances," and cautions Americans to have trade relations with other nations only, not military engagement. That is actually America First not Trump's Jew under-girded imperialism. America was never supposed to be globe girding empire, do you really not understand that?
More of an Alexander Hamilton guy myself, actually, when it comes to foreign policy. I wasn't aware that by virtue of being an American I had to worship one single founding father (among many others that constantly fought with each other) and treat everything he said as law. You're aware that the Constitutional Convention had 55 delegates who couldn't even agree whether blacks were people, right?
Europe suffers from the thing that all whites suffer from: unwillingness to criticize nons. They do the same for "climate action" - they harangue first worlders instead of the real source of pollution.
European leftists criticize Americans because they imagine Americans as white (still). When we have a string of administrations with last names ending in vowels or first names with apostrophes, they will stop the criticism.
As for European rightists, they resent the fact that America has the politicians they don't.
Scott: America is an empire. Now get over it!
Also Scott: America is inconsequential.
Keep shedding those IQ points, sir.
I'm not surprised that a person who follows non-white "white nationalists" would be incapable of understanding basic points.
I do follow a diverse set of people and publications, because I want to be informed; It is necessary to follow your adversaries and advocates to better understand events. Unfortunately, you are proving yourself to be an adversary—not just to me, but to our people as well. Perhaps, cynically, you are aware of the direness we face, so you’ve decided to get what you can get. And maybe that’s why you have chosen to be an establishment propagandist—whose role it is to gaslight Whites repeatedly.
Prediction: as soon as you weasel your way into a higher paying patronage network, you will paywall your comments section.
By now, I know how this game works.
Who is your people? You're anti-American and think Hispanics are your people so long as they do socialism for BASED reasons. Whiteness is an artificial identity for you. Otherwise, you would recognize the absurdity of declaring your "people" to be anti-American non-whites who happen to like Hitler.
I used to paywall my comments section. I opened it to allow for more discussion. Sadly, it's led to morons like you appearing with your drivel. But I still will keep it open
What is America, Scott? What is an American, Scott? Define what you mean. Be clear so that your entire audience understands. Can hardly wait. Afraid to say, but you’re going to use up a lot of those precious IQ points you cherish.
Traditional American identity has always been linked with whiteness. Non-whites who hate America, celebrate every brown communist state, and pretend to be Nazis are not really American.
Well, you almost answered. Until you didn’t. Nice deflection.
Bear in mind that I am calling you out for being insufficiently pro White.
As an aside, wonder if our clans got along back in the day—in the old country.
Islam and multiculturalism are just SYMPTOMS of the American economic model.
Lenin predicted that Capitalism would suck in labour from across the World and America would be the prime example.
European Civilisation got captured by that model in 1945 and never broke free.
America herself is turning away from this economic model. Most Europeans criticize America for departing from this economic model. I find it interesting that European leaders will decry American influence, but then when Trump tries to withdraw influence and support from Europe, they have a panic attack. The main thing preventing America from bringing her troops home is the Europeans demanding they stay (with the collaboration of the American left).
There are two forces erupting at once. Nationalism makes for more friction between nations and it isn't surprising for nationalists of different countries to butt heads once in awhile. There's also a pan-Western battle between globalists and nationalists. The globalists are flooding the West with migrants, making terrible trade deals, starting wars and so on. Germany and the UK have govts that are the Biden admin on steroids, already where the U.S. Democrats might get to in 2032 or 2036 should they keep drifting in the same direction. The best criticism I've seen of Trump is the rhetoric allows the Starmers of Europe to act like nationalists. Canada is going way off the deep-end for similar reasons, such that Alberta really has an incentive to get out now before Carney and the Liberals take them past the point of no return.
The way most of Europe is strangling any kind of free speech (especially the Germans and the UK but the list is long), we must be their enemies. Germany has historically prevented the lower classes from speaking their minds (well, they have recently made exceptions for migrants but no one else) but the UK under the heel of Tories and Laborites is almost as anti-free speech as Germany. The elites in Europe today really do want to live like European nobles in the 1800s did.
It's one thing to oppose Europe's attacks on free speech and the EU actively advocating for WWIII against Russia and wholly another to endorse Trump's attack on Denmark/Greenland. Are you even capable of understanding such distinctions or are you a grug brained room temperature IQ subhuman?
And before you tar me as a shitlib I am literally a National Socialist, i.e.WAY right of you.
The orange man blew the dog whistle, the dog cringed then gave up the part of his bone that the orange man wanted. Mission accomplished from the orange point of view. But that's totally irrelevant to my original reply. We can't be friends with nations that prevent 95% (guess) of their people from saying anything the rulers don't like. If nothing else, they think of most US people as being lower-class scum just like their lower-class. No possible basis for friendship with someone who despises you. Kinda like jews wanting to be friends with nazis, not a hope in the world for the jew to haye a friendship relationship with a nazi.
FYI: No one skilled in negotiations starts negotiating by asking for what they want. They start by asking for way more so they give the other person can claim to have "won". Just like the European leaders are doing now.
Oh you are literally retarded, never mind.
Where did multiculturalism come from in the first place? Yes, Europe produced Rousseau and Marx (who wasn't a European, however) but neither of their ideologies compare to destruction wrought on by Hobbes and Locke in the long run. Say what you will about Soviets, after the short Trotskyist experiment at the beginning, they stopped imposing liberalism and turned into a relatively normal empire with a corrupt oligarchy and stupid ideology as religion that no one actually believed. America doesn't stop there.
So Europe should hand over Greenland, bend over to the US, and say "Thank you sir, may I have another?" And what does it say about American influence that the countries that were under the Iron Curtain are far more based today than those that were in NATO for the Cold War?
This rift between America and Europe is just like when George W Bush and Donald Rumsfeld were criticizing Europe and introducing "freedom fries" -- nothing's really changed. Fundamentally, America is a jingoistic, militaristic power that Europe doesn't understand or feel comfortable with. America always has the itch to invade countries or dabble in regime change, it's like excessive testosterone. (It's also religious and Puritan, which Europe has a problem with, but that's another matter.) Many on the far-right claim to dislike American neocons but Trump is very much a neocon, just a new iteration of it. The author of this blog disagreed that the Trump administration is neocon-ish, but what about this? "The U.S. Is Actively Seeking Regime Change in Cuba by the End of the Year" - Wall Street Joirnal: https://www.wsj.com/world/americas/the-u-s-is-actively-seeking-regime-change-in-cuba-by-the-end-of-the-year-1d0f178a
America has tried to do regime change in Cuba for nearly 70 years. We successfully did regime change several times in our past. I don't think the Spanish-American War was neocon. A peaceful regime change in Cuba would be in our interest. Having a role in the world and defending the national interest doesn't mean neocon. Too many think that in order to NOT be a neocon, we can't interact with the world at all or ever use our military.
"Ynaks"? Too busy trying to drum up controversy for book sales to actually edit? You consistently confuse Europeans, European politicians and unelected bureaucrats as one blob that represents the whole of Europe. Your only evidence that Europe status quo would continue is an event from the 18th century. Finally, you completely absolve America of funding leftist groups for decades. All things considered, it would seem the only reason you flipped on the matter is because you found a matter that would draw attention to yourself and your book.
I offer a ton of examples showing why the status quo would likely stay. You need to read beyond the French Revolution reference. I also don't absolve America of funding left-wing groups. It's pretty consistent to stand up for your country when attacked as the Great Satan and certain pretend their people have no agency.
In terms of representation, these are your leaders. I could've also pointed out how millions of Germans flooded the streets over AfD leaders merely meeting with Martin Sellner. That was not engineered by the CIA.
As I say in the piece, there are legitimate criticisms to make of America. But pretending we're the real enemy and everything would be BASED and Redpilled without us is delusional
America is an evil jewish empire holding White people hostage.
Death to America.
As long as America is ruled by a liberal-Zionist state, America will remain an enemy.
A lot of problems on both sides of the Atlantic are attributed to the Allied victory in WWII. It’s unfalsifiable and rings true given our current circumstances.
Yet the real redpill imo is that the “pozz” was coming regardless of the victor in that contest. Libtardery was going to be ascendant, even under (and perhaps worse) the swastika. Modernity was getting its pound of flesh no matter the regime.
A fun way to troll the lost cause/“if only” crowd (yes, even Southerners) is to go even further back and attribute our current situation to some other conflict. My favorite is Sulla’s civil war. “If only the Populares had won! We wouldn’t have troons!”
Also, whatever Yockey’s problems were, I think we have to admit that a reasonably neutral and honest biopic of his life would be wildly entertaining. Starring Ryan Gosling of course.
Bullocks, How would America react if Russia claimed Alaska? What Trump is doing is illegal under the U.N. charter which as a treaty signed by the Federal government is binding law on the U.S. according to the Constitution.
I am no fan of globalism, but actual America first is not imperialist land grabs, it is living peacefully with other nations and trading with them as envisioned by the foundling fathers as for example in Washington's farewell address.Trump's aggressive imperialist ambitions more closely resemble the internationalism of Trotskyite communism than actual America First policies. This ought not be surprising as the (((neo-cons))) who hijacked Trump's foreign policy started out as Trotskyite Jews at New School in New York City.
>"I am no fan of globalism"
>first complaint is about how something is illegal under the UN
Ok man.
Also America was not built by peaceful land grabs. Please look up the Indian Wars and the Mexican-American war. We've always been an empire.
It's possible to oppose globalism, and to want to withdraw from it peacefully, legally and gradually to not cause WWIII, grug brain.
And your history is not accurate, we had 40 years of not being an empire up to the time of Andrew Jackson's attacks on Indians, and the Monroe Doctrine both of which were betrayals of the peaceful isolationist intent of the founding fathers as expressed by Washington and Jefferson.
>"holocaust enjoyer"
>self-proclaimed National Socialist
>cries over the Monroe Doctrine and Indian Wars
Dude you're just a disagreeable libtard who likes Hitler and hates America. Not worth engaging with.
Literally just an ad hominem. Clearly you aren’t much of a thinker if you don’t understand basic logical fallacies.
Sorry when was that forty year period of peaceful isolationism? Was it when we purchased Louisiana from France in 1803 and settled it en masse, violently displacing the natives for decades before AJ took the presidency? Or was it when we attacked Great Britain in 1812 to claim Canada?
"How would America react if Russia claimed Alaska?"
We would probably move a couple carrier strike groups to the North Pacific and tell them to come and take it. We have about ten more of those than Russia, which is why they won't claim Alaska.
Like what fantasy world do you people live in lol
You are legit reared aren't you? You literally couldn't grasp I was making an analogy. How do you manage to function like get up every day and make breakfast, tie your shoes, and drive to work?
Yes, and I was picking apart your analogy by illustrating that such scenarios are determined more by military might than by countries' dedication to "international norms" or whatever.
LOL, "people," like you betray everything Geroge Washington fought for. Your punishment for being an obnoxious imbecile is to read Washington's farewell address that was about avoiding "entangling alliances," and cautions Americans to have trade relations with other nations only, not military engagement. That is actually America First not Trump's Jew under-girded imperialism. America was never supposed to be globe girding empire, do you really not understand that?
More of an Alexander Hamilton guy myself, actually, when it comes to foreign policy. I wasn't aware that by virtue of being an American I had to worship one single founding father (among many others that constantly fought with each other) and treat everything he said as law. You're aware that the Constitutional Convention had 55 delegates who couldn't even agree whether blacks were people, right?
EU: “Yanks, go home!”
Trump: “OK.”
EU: “Not like that!”